Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: GSoC - proposal - Materialized Views in PostgreSQL

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pavelbaros <baros(dot)p(at)seznam(dot)cz>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: GSoC - proposal - Materialized Views in PostgreSQL
Date: 2010-04-12 10:52:05
Message-ID: l2o603c8f071004120352y99c679fbz9a772fa2622e2fde@mail.gmail.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 2:16 AM, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> I am sure so
> dynamical materialised views is bad task for GSoC - it is too large,
> too complex. Manually refreshed views is adequate to two months work
> and it has sense.

That is my feeling also - though I fear that even the simplest
possible implementation of this feature may be a stretch.  Anyway we
agree: keep it simple.

...Robert

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Robert HaasDate: 2010-04-12 11:07:16
Subject: Re: testing HS/SR - 1 vs 2 performance
Previous:From: Heikki LinnakangasDate: 2010-04-12 10:49:34
Subject: Re: testing hot standby

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group