On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 2:16 AM, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> I am sure so
> dynamical materialised views is bad task for GSoC - it is too large,
> too complex. Manually refreshed views is adequate to two months work
> and it has sense.
That is my feeling also - though I fear that even the simplest
possible implementation of this feature may be a stretch. Anyway we
agree: keep it simple.
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Robert Haas||Date: 2010-04-12 11:07:16|
|Subject: Re: testing HS/SR - 1 vs 2 performance|
|Previous:||From: Heikki Linnakangas||Date: 2010-04-12 10:49:34|
|Subject: Re: testing hot standby|