Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: sorry, too many standbys already vs. MaxWalSenders vs. max_wal_senders

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Thom Brown <thombrown(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: sorry, too many standbys already vs. MaxWalSenders vs. max_wal_senders
Date: 2010-04-01 00:51:23
Message-ID: l2o603c8f071003311751t7f8ae372zc3396ce195b07ae0@mail.gmail.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 11:24 AM, Thom Brown <thombrown(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> [patch]

As a general rule, I really appreciate people being willing to take
the time to put proposed changes into patch form, even if they're
small, but this three-line patch contains two bugs.  :-(

Thanks for your many typo corrections, though!

...Robert

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Fujii MasaoDate: 2010-04-01 01:01:57
Subject: Re: Parameter name standby_mode
Previous:From: Matthew AltusDate: 2010-04-01 00:42:14
Subject: Alias to rollback keyword

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group