Re: raid10 write performance

From: Ivan Voras <ivoras(at)freebsd(dot)org>
To: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: raid10 write performance
Date: 2010-06-23 12:25:05
Message-ID: hvsueq$fh4$1@dough.gmane.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

On 06/23/10 14:00, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Ivan Voras:
>
>> On the other hand, RAID10 is simple enough that soft-RAID
>> implementations should be more than adequate - any ideas why a dedicated
>> card has it "slow"?
>
> Barrier support on RAID10 seems to require some smallish amount of
> non-volatile storage which supports a high number of write operations
> per second, so a software-only solution might not be available.

If I understand you correctly, this can be said in general for all
spinning-disk usage and is not specific to RAID10. (And in the case of
high, constant TPS, no amount of NVRAM will help you).

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Matthew Wakeling 2010-06-23 12:46:13 Re: raid10 write performance
Previous Message Florian Weimer 2010-06-23 12:00:21 Re: raid10 write performance