My bad - I thought I had, so it has been re-posted with a (v2) disclaimer in
the title... like THAT will stop the flaming! <g>
Thanks for your patience!
"Craig James" <craig_james(at)emolecules(dot)com> wrote in message
> Carlo Stonebanks wrote:
>> Guys, I want to thank you for all of the advice - my client has just made
>> a surprise announcement that he would like to set start from scratch with
>> a new server, so I am afraid that all of this great advice has to be seen
>> in the context of whatever decision is made on that. I am out there,
>> hat-in-hand, looking for advice under the PERFORM post: "New server to
>> improve performance on our large and busy DB - advice?"
> You might start this as a new topic with a relevant title, and reiterate
> your database requirements. Otherwise it will get submerged as just a
> footnote to your original question. It's really nice to be able to
> quickly find the new-equipment discussions.
> Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
In response to
pgsql-performance by date
|Next:||From: Dave Crooke||Date: 2010-01-14 22:35:53|
|Subject: Re: New server to improve performance on our large and busy DB - advice? (v2)|
|Previous:||From: Scott Marlowe||Date: 2010-01-14 21:43:29|
|Subject: Re: New server to improve performance on our large and busy DB - advice?|