Re: planet "top posters" section

From: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
To: Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-www <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Selena Deckelmann <selenamarie(at)gmail(dot)com>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, "Andreas 'ads' Scherbaum" <adsmail(at)wars-nicht(dot)de>
Subject: Re: planet "top posters" section
Date: 2010-04-22 17:20:40
Message-ID: h2v9837222c1004221020lbec5cb8ehbb1dddf1f6f1c38d@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-www

On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 03:18, Robert Treat
<xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net> wrote:
> More importantly, there's a flaw in your query me thinks. OmniTI currently
> shows having 9 posts in the team section, which also matches the breakdown of
> my cohorts (4,3,2) in the top posters section, however I also have a blog post
> on the 13th, so I'd think that we should have at least 10 posts on our "Team",
> no? I'm guessing others might be off as well, I only noticed cause I knew I had
> blogged recently.

Uh, que? There may be more posts now, but I see:

Hubert - 4
Theo - 3
You - 2

Which is 9, which happens to be what's listed as OmnitTI.

I don't think you get to count yourself twice ;)

--
Magnus Hagander
Me: http://www.hagander.net/
Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joshua D. Drake 2010-04-22 18:40:17 Re: planet "top posters" section
Previous Message Joshua D. Drake 2010-04-22 17:18:49 Re: [www] download page is outdated