Re: [DOCS] Pattern for use of the alias "Postgres"

From: "Marc G(dot) Fournier From": <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
To: pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [DOCS] Pattern for use of the alias "Postgres"
Date: 2007-10-26 20:28:03
Message-ID: fftikj$95r$1@news.hub.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy pgsql-docs

bruce(at)momjian(dot)us (Bruce Momjian) writes:

>Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> Bruce Momjian wrote:
>> > Let's not get sidetracked here. ?There was already agreement in
>> > advocacy to promote the use of the alias, and this thread is to
>> > discuss that, not to revisit whether we should use an alias or not.
>>
>> Advocacy opinions have no bearing on proper documentation writing. Nor
>> do I believe that there was an actual agreement.

>I disagree.

You are welcome to do so, but you are in the wrong ... there was agreement
on changing the FAQ, there was strong disagreement on changing the official
docs ...

Is there a reason why this is such a high priority on your agenda?

--
----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email . scrappy(at)hub(dot)org MSN . scrappy(at)hub(dot)org
Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.org ICQ . 7615664

In response to

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message scrappy 2007-10-26 20:30:03 Re: [DOCS] Pattern for use of the alias "Postgres"
Previous Message Joshua D. Drake 2007-10-26 20:25:09 First mention option for Postgres

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message scrappy 2007-10-26 20:30:03 Re: [DOCS] Pattern for use of the alias "Postgres"
Previous Message Joshua D. Drake 2007-10-26 20:25:09 First mention option for Postgres