Re: [DOCS] Partition: use triggers instead of rules

i would say have both, but just mention that for performance reasons its
better to use triggers.

On Nov 29, 2007 8:29 PM, Michael Paesold <mpaesold(at)gmx(dot)at> wrote:

> NikhilS wrote:
> >> The argument I made for keeping the example around is not
> > dependent on
> >> the assumption that using a rule is a good idea. It's dependent on
> >> the established fact that we have recommended that in prior
> >> releases, and therefore people are going to be seeing that
> >> construct in real databases.
> >
> > And they could refer back to the older version of the documentation
> > for it. In fact, we should mention that in the patch:
> >
> > <note><para>If you have a partitioning setup that uses rules please
> > refer to the 8.2 documentation on partitioning</para></note>
> >
> > +1
>
> I would also add another sentence about *why* the recommendation was
> changed. We have one rule-based setup here, and it has been working
> flawlessly for us,... so personally I don't even know the reasons.
>
> Best Regards
> Michael Paesold
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
> subscribe-nomail command to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org so that your
> message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
>

--
Usama Munir Dar
Consultant Architect
Cell:+92 321 5020666
Skype: usamadar