| From: | Lukas Kahwe Smith <smith(at)pooteeweet(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: mysql proxy |
| Date: | 2007-08-28 15:48:41 |
| Message-ID: | fb1g4r$1dd2$1@news.hub.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
Lukas Kahwe Smith wrote:
> Andrew Sullivan wrote:
>
>> I don't care what people do with their data, especially if they're
>> using MySQL. What I am arguing against is adding something like this
>> proxy capability to Postgres. The reason I'm arguing against such a
>> capability is that it looks to me like an immense man in the middle
>> attack just itching to happen. I think it's a misfeature, for that
>> reason.
>
> Fair enough, I now understand much better how PostgreSQL approaches
> making similar (or better) capabilities available.
Doh, sorry for the triple post. Probably some proxy interference :)
regards,
Lukas
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Harald Armin Massa | 2007-08-28 15:56:50 | Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL) |
| Previous Message | Lukas Kahwe Smith | 2007-08-28 15:42:50 | Re: mysql proxy |