Re: pgpool2 vs sequoia

From: "Andy Dale" <andy(dot)dale(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "mljv(at)planwerk6(dot)de" <mljv(at)planwerk6(dot)de>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pgpool2 vs sequoia
Date: 2007-08-02 10:04:11
Message-ID: faa313130708020304y1a375839jf774bee0bb05a8c7@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Hi,

You might also want to check out HA-JDBC at http://ha-jdbc.sourceforge.net

Cheers,

Andy

On 02/08/07, mljv(at)planwerk6(dot)de <mljv(at)planwerk6(dot)de> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> i would like to use a statement replication for postgresql
>
> i have found the following solutions:
> - pgpool
> - pgpool2
> - sequoia (jdbc, formerly known as c-jdbc)
>
> pgpool has only two nodes, so this is not an option.
>
> I will never change my underlying database, of course :-)
> So i dont have any advantage of the sequoia jdbc abstraction. i'd rather
> sometimes use other tools than jdbc to access the database with some perl
> scripts, so this is an advantage for pgpool2. but sequoia looks very nice
> at
> first glance.
>
> What are other advantages/disadvantages in respect of
> - performance/scalability
> - stability
> - support / ease-of-use / etc.
>
> i would be very happy if someone can share his/her expierence with such a
> solution.
>
> kind regards,
> janning
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message mljv 2007-08-02 11:35:18 Re: pgpool2 vs sequoia
Previous Message mljv 2007-08-02 09:58:40 pgpool2 vs sequoia