Re: Sourceforge PG release

From: Guido Barosio <gbarosio(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, Devrim GÜNDÜZ <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org>, PostgreSQL www <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Sourceforge PG release
Date: 2009-07-05 15:13:55
Message-ID: f7f6b4c70907050813k749da2fdwc61cccdbcb3376ea@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-www

Sorry, though you were talking about *a new* issue.

gb.-

On Sun, Jul 5, 2009 at 12:05 PM, Dave Page<dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> wrote:
> Err, the one this thread is about? (updating sf.net).
>
> On 7/5/09, Guido Barosio <gbarosio(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> Which item Dave?
>>
>> GB.-
>>
>> On Sun, Jul 5, 2009 at 11:19 AM, Dave Page<dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> wrote:
>>> Thats what we already have essentially. We just had an issue with one
>>> minor item which got overlooked.
>>>
>>> Fwiw, i think having an sf.net project is a *bad* idea anyway. It's
>>> confusing for people who find that project and don't realise it's not
>>> actually used for anything. It seems a strange thing to maintain
>>> anyway - it's not exactly likely to attract new users.
>>>
>>>
>>> On 7/5/09, Guido Barosio <gbarosio(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>>> Should we treat releases as projects, including pm's, taking care of
>>>> checklists while mitigating risks?
>>>>
>>>> Note the "including a PM". One per release, tracking and delivering.
>>>> Community driven, public reporting.
>>>>
>>>> I can help preparing a project template draft.
>>>>
>>>> Gb.
>>>>
>>>> 2009/7/5, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>:
>>>>> Dave Page wrote:
>>>>>> On 7/5/09, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
>>>>>> > Robert Treat wrote:
>>>>>> >> On Sunday 05 July 2009 06:22:42 Devrim G?ND?Z wrote:
>>>>>> >> > On Sun, 2009-07-05 at 11:32 +0300, Devrim G?ND?Z wrote:
>>>>>> >> > > >         o  Why do I not have release permissions for our
>>>>>> >> > > > project?
>>>>>> >> > >
>>>>>> >> > > You should
>>>>>> >> >
>>>>>> >> > Oops, I just saw that you were not granted permission for that.
>>>>>> >> > Fixed.
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >> This means we can start blaming Bruce for releases not getting put
>>>>>> >> up,
>>>>>> >> right? :-D
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > Perhaps.  My big question is why we are doing this now, and not a few
>>>>>> > days ago.  Updating external download sites was supposed to be on
>>>>>> > some
>>>>>> > checklist so we didn't have to fix this days after the official
>>>>>> > release.
>>>>>> > Where is it listed?
>>>>>> >
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/84WebTasks
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks.  Here is the line that I am interested in:
>>>>>
>>>>>      7/1 19:00        6/30 15:00      Update Freshmeat etc.   Jonathan
>>>>> F.
>>>>>      Josh & Devrim
>>>>>
>>>>> OK, so why wasn't this done?  And who is Jonathan F.?  Can we please
>>>>> spell out his full last name because if I don't know who he is, others
>>>>> don't as well.  And Marc should be listed as a backup on that item, I
>>>>> think.
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>>   Bruce Momjian  <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>        http://momjian.us
>>>>>   EnterpriseDB                             http://enterprisedb.com
>>>>>
>>>>>   + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Sent via pgsql-www mailing list (pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org)
>>>>> To make changes to your subscription:
>>>>> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-www
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Enviado desde mi dispositivo móvil
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Dave Page
>>> EnterpriseDB UK:   http://www.enterprisedb.com
>>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Dave Page
> EnterpriseDB UK:   http://www.enterprisedb.com
>

In response to

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Marc G. Fournier 2009-07-05 17:39:23 Re: Sourceforge PG release
Previous Message Devrim GÜNDÜZ 2009-07-05 15:07:23 Re: Sourceforge PG release