Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Sourceforge PG release

From: Guido Barosio <gbarosio(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, Devrim GÜNDÜZ <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org>, PostgreSQL www <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Sourceforge PG release
Date: 2009-07-05 14:36:45
Message-ID: f7f6b4c70907050736o73492960n48044129bba7772f@mail.gmail.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-www
Which item Dave?

GB.-

On Sun, Jul 5, 2009 at 11:19 AM, Dave Page<dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> wrote:
> Thats what we already have essentially. We just had an issue with one
> minor item which got overlooked.
>
> Fwiw, i think having an sf.net project is a *bad* idea anyway. It's
> confusing for people who find that project and don't realise it's not
> actually used for anything. It seems a strange thing to maintain
> anyway - it's not exactly likely to attract new users.
>
>
> On 7/5/09, Guido Barosio <gbarosio(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> Should we treat releases as projects, including pm's, taking care of
>> checklists while mitigating risks?
>>
>> Note the "including a PM". One per release, tracking and delivering.
>> Community driven, public reporting.
>>
>> I can help preparing a project template draft.
>>
>> Gb.
>>
>> 2009/7/5, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>:
>>> Dave Page wrote:
>>>> On 7/5/09, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
>>>> > Robert Treat wrote:
>>>> >> On Sunday 05 July 2009 06:22:42 Devrim G?ND?Z wrote:
>>>> >> > On Sun, 2009-07-05 at 11:32 +0300, Devrim G?ND?Z wrote:
>>>> >> > > >         o  Why do I not have release permissions for our
>>>> >> > > > project?
>>>> >> > >
>>>> >> > > You should
>>>> >> >
>>>> >> > Oops, I just saw that you were not granted permission for that.
>>>> >> > Fixed.
>>>> >>
>>>> >> This means we can start blaming Bruce for releases not getting put up,
>>>> >> right? :-D
>>>> >
>>>> > Perhaps.  My big question is why we are doing this now, and not a few
>>>> > days ago.  Updating external download sites was supposed to be on some
>>>> > checklist so we didn't have to fix this days after the official
>>>> > release.
>>>> > Where is it listed?
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>> http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/84WebTasks
>>>
>>> Thanks.  Here is the line that I am interested in:
>>>
>>>      7/1 19:00        6/30 15:00      Update Freshmeat etc.   Jonathan F.
>>>      Josh & Devrim
>>>
>>> OK, so why wasn't this done?  And who is Jonathan F.?  Can we please
>>> spell out his full last name because if I don't know who he is, others
>>> don't as well.  And Marc should be listed as a backup on that item, I
>>> think.
>>>
>>> --
>>>   Bruce Momjian  <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>        http://momjian.us
>>>   EnterpriseDB                             http://enterprisedb.com
>>>
>>>   + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
>>>
>>> --
>>> Sent via pgsql-www mailing list (pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org)
>>> To make changes to your subscription:
>>> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-www
>>>
>>
>> --
>> Enviado desde mi dispositivo móvil
>>
>
>
> --
> Dave Page
> EnterpriseDB UK:   http://www.enterprisedb.com
>

In response to

Responses

pgsql-www by date

Next:From: Dave PageDate: 2009-07-05 15:05:49
Subject: Re: Sourceforge PG release
Previous:From: Dave PageDate: 2009-07-05 14:19:26
Subject: Re: Sourceforge PG release

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group