Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: What CASE tools and clients for Postgres?

From: lobet_romuald(at)my-deja(dot)com (Romuald Lobet)
To: pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org(dot)pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org(dot)pgsql-ports(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: What CASE tools and clients for Postgres?
Date: 2001-06-07 09:17:21
Message-ID: f4cd3e0f.0106070117.31cad409@posting.google.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-adminpgsql-generalpgsql-ports
Sam Staton <sam(dot)staton(at)bigfoot(dot)com> wrote in message 
> Aren't Nassi-Schneiderman diagrams primarily for describing control
> flow, not data modelling? 

Hi Sam, 

That's right. Sorry, my know-how about Postgres is poor.

Note that INNOVATOR (MID) and RHAPSODY (I-LOGIX) are able to manage
about data modeling. Also, I think SW and DATA must be considered 
in the same design.

Not sure INNOVATOR and RHAPSODY are compatible with Postgres, however.

Romuald.

In response to

pgsql-ports by date

Next:From: Gautam SinhaDate: 2001-06-08 16:36:38
Subject: Very urgent
Previous:From: Leandro MedinaDate: 2001-06-06 19:17:30
Subject: VACUUM ANALYZE in QNX RTP

pgsql-admin by date

Next:From: Tauren MillsDate: 2001-06-07 09:34:51
Subject: Problems starting postmaster with maxconnections changed
Previous:From: Brian BaquiranDate: 2001-06-07 04:00:17
Subject: Re: Intentionally splitting data in a table across files.

pgsql-general by date

Next:From: Hervé PiedvacheDate: 2001-06-07 09:19:44
Subject: Accessing two differents database in a SELECT
Previous:From: Somazx InterestingDate: 2001-06-07 08:08:15
Subject: Can not pg_dumpall

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group