| From: | Anj Adu <fotographs(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Igor Polishchuk <ipolishchuk(at)hi5(dot)com>, pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: pg_autovacuum entries |
| Date: | 2009-11-04 20:05:28 |
| Message-ID: | f2fd819a0911041205j1f8ac2ct37f75d2539cfe629@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-admin |
Thanks..i will stick to vacuumdb in 8.1 (which works fine..just takes
a couple of days to finish)
Migration is an option..but our databases are enormous..(> 800G) and
we have several of them
On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 12:00 PM, Alvaro Herrera
<alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
> Anj Adu escribió:
>> If I were to use autovacuum on 8.1 , and If I specify the "ignore'
>> tables in pg_autovacuum,
>>
>> 1. will the XID wraparound counter be reset after autovacuum finishes
>
> No.
>
> I think you really need to get off 8.1.
>
> --
> Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
> The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Fujii Masao | 2009-11-05 04:19:11 | Re: [HACKERS] pg_standby doesnt't work |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2009-11-04 20:00:00 | Re: pg_autovacuum entries |