From: | Anj Adu <fotographs(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
Cc: | "Tomeh, Husam" <HTomeh(at)facorelogic(dot)com>, pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: vacuumdb knowledge of prior vacuum |
Date: | 2009-11-03 02:47:00 |
Message-ID: | f2fd819a0911021847g572df219i772138a5decac287@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-admin |
And autovacuum will reset the XID counter even if it skips tables
right? Just wanted to confirm before enabling autovacuum.
Thanks
Sriram
On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 5:39 PM, Alvaro Herrera
<alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
> Tomeh, Husam escribió:
>> How about if using autovacuum daemon instead?
>
> Autovacuum only processes tables that need vacuuming, per the configured
> parameters, so yes, it skips tables that were "recently" processed
> (where "recently" is defined by said parameters and operations).
>
> --
> Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
> The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-admin mailing list (pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-admin
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2009-11-03 02:52:13 | Re: vacuumdb knowledge of prior vacuum |
Previous Message | Hengky Lie | 2009-11-03 01:55:06 | Please Help... Service fails to start |