And autovacuum will reset the XID counter even if it skips tables
right? Just wanted to confirm before enabling autovacuum.
On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 5:39 PM, Alvaro Herrera
> Tomeh, Husam escribió:
>> How about if using autovacuum daemon instead?
> Autovacuum only processes tables that need vacuuming, per the configured
> parameters, so yes, it skips tables that were "recently" processed
> (where "recently" is defined by said parameters and operations).
> Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
> The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
> Sent via pgsql-admin mailing list (pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
In response to
pgsql-admin by date
|Next:||From: Alvaro Herrera||Date: 2009-11-03 02:52:13|
|Subject: Re: vacuumdb knowledge of prior vacuum|
|Previous:||From: Hengky Lie||Date: 2009-11-03 01:55:06|
|Subject: Please Help... Service fails to start|