-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


> I think for processing-oriented output, the system described in the
> SQL/XML standard draft is the way to go.  Considering the people who wrote
> it, it's probably pulled from, or bound to appear in, a major commercial
> database.

Do you have a link to the exact section? I've found conflicting versions 
of what constitutes the "standard" for xml output of SQL data.

> I also think that psql is not the place to implement something like this.
> It's most likely best put in the backend, as a function like
> 
>     xmlfoo('select * from t1;')
> 
> Then any interface and application that likes it, not just psql-based
> ones, can use it.

I think that is a good long-term solution, but I still think we need 
to address the TODO item in the short run, and allow for a simple 
reformatting of the query results from psql. If not, we should remove 
that TODO item form psql and add a different one to the backend section.

- --
Greg Sabino Mullane greg(at)turnstep(dot)com
PGP Key: 0x14964AC8 200303061020

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Comment: http://www.turnstep.com/pgp.html

iD8DBQE+Z2jHvJuQZxSWSsgRAj7IAJ4hLEos9OlE67O02gVrrqxwT9n3AQCeJxto
N2LFyvXPfGY2whPUs5k+PQA=
=PYfs
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

In response to

• Re: XML ouput for psql at 2003-03-05 22:37:35 from Peter Eisentraut

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:	From: Tom Lane	Date: 2003-03-06 15:35:59
	Subject: Re: ETA for PostgreSQL 7.3.3?
Previous:	From: greg	Date: 2003-03-06 15:23:39
	Subject: Re: Who puts the Windows binaries on the FTP server?

pgsql-patches by date

Next:	From: Bruce Momjian	Date: 2003-03-06 19:01:36
	Subject: Re: performance: use pread instead of lseek+read
Previous:	From: Bruce Momjian	Date: 2003-03-06 02:30:28
	Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Non-colliding auto generated names