Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Re: Proposal to fix Statement.executeBatch()

From: Rene Pijlman <rpijlman(at)wanadoo(dot)nl>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Barry Lind <barry(at)xythos(dot)com>, pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Re: Proposal to fix Statement.executeBatch()
Date: 2001-08-28 17:31:18
Message-ID: etknotkrt50jcahuhn1v9hq7jvjqpkhjho@4ax.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-jdbc
On Tue, 28 Aug 2001 12:31:53 -0400 (EDT), you wrote:
>Can someone suggest what is to be done with the propsed patch?

Barry's proposal for a more efficient implementation of
executeBatch() does not invalidate the patch. It just means we
still have more work to do to get the performance improvement
this feature is all about.

The patch improves JDBC compliance independent of the
performance improvement, and it adds a test case. If there are
no objections (haven't seen any) I'd suggest it is applied.

Regards,
René Pijlman

In response to

pgsql-jdbc by date

Next:From: Barry LindDate: 2001-08-28 19:55:19
Subject: Re: Escape Processing problems
Previous:From: T.R.MissnerDate: 2001-08-28 17:18:25
Subject: RE: Unterminated quoted string error.

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group