And how about just saying something in the docs like: deprecated ?
Or let the code and rip off just the docs about inheritance.
On Wed, 30 Jun 2004 09:53:53 +0200, Thomas Hallgren
<thhal(at)mailblocks(dot)com> wrote:
>
> elein wrote:
> > I strongly suggest a more cautious approach than "ripping
> > things out." Ripping out time travel got us row space
> > but lost point in time recovery. And is pushing us to
> > implement more traditionally logging. It was an OK trade
> > in the long run, but it took us a long time to get around to pitr.
> >
> The approach could perhaps be as simple as changing the terminology.