On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 2:23 PM, David E. Wheeler <david(at)kineticode(dot)com> wrote:
> On Mar 29, 2010, at 9:02 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> If this is going to end up being one fairly small C file implementing
>> a spec that is not a moving target, I'd vote against depending on an
>> external library instead, no matter how spiffy and license-compatible
>> the external library might be.
> Perhaps you could fork one, in that case.
I'm considering using and adapting cJSON instead of continuing with my
redundant implementation. I could run `indent -kr -i4` on it (will
that match PostgreSQL's coding style?), add support for UTF-16
surrogate pairs (pair of \u... escapes for each character above U+FFFF
as required by the JSON spec), and add a switch to turn on/off pure
P.S.: Sorry for the repeat, David. I forgot to CC the mailing list.
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Josh Berkus||Date: 2010-03-29 18:52:34|
|Subject: Re: Alpha release this week?|
|Previous:||From: David E. Wheeler||Date: 2010-03-29 18:23:16|
|Subject: Re: Proposal: Add JSON support |