Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [RFC] Unsigned integer support.

From: "Ryan Bradetich" <rbradetich(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Dann Corbit" <DCorbit(at)connx(dot)com>
Cc: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Gregory Stark" <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [RFC] Unsigned integer support.
Date: 2008-07-26 03:50:02
Message-ID: e739902b0807252050k49a0635dj5ced5ba1fd45e657@mail.gmail.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Hello Dann,

On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 1:06 PM, Dann Corbit <DCorbit(at)connx(dot)com> wrote:

> At the cost of one bit of storage, you have compatible types using

Thanks for your review and feedback!  Unfortunately, I do need the full range
of the unsigned types for the project I am looking at.  The reason I started
working on these types is because it seemed wasteful to use the next size
larger signed integer for the storage type of the unsigned integer.

Thanks for the suggestion!

- Ryan

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2008-07-26 04:03:28
Subject: Re: [RFC] Unsigned integer support.
Previous:From: Ryan BradetichDate: 2008-07-26 03:41:57
Subject: Re: [RFC] Unsigned integer support.

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group