Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: pgsql: Add relation fork support to pg_relation_size() function.

From: "Marko Kreen" <markokr(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Gregory Stark" <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: "Heikki Linnakangas" <heikki(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pgsql: Add relation fork support to pg_relation_size() function.
Date: 2008-10-03 11:27:50
Message-ID: e51f66da0810030427k1adbff79g4ebe1feaa3c1f76e@mail.gmail.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-committerspgsql-hackers
On 10/3/08, Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
>  Hm, I wonder if we should have made the forks use a fork "name" instead of a
>  number. It sure would be nicer to have files name 12345.fsm instead of another
>  opaque number.
>
>  The other reason I thought of this is that if EDB or anyone else uses forks
>  for a private purpose then it would avoid the whole issue of conflicts. The
>  best option right now would be to set aside a range of values for private
>  purposes.

Good idea.

-- 
marko

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2008-10-03 12:28:15
Subject: Re: numeric_big test
Previous:From: Gregory StarkDate: 2008-10-03 09:31:07
Subject: Re: pgsql: Add relation fork support to pg_relation_size() function.

pgsql-committers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2008-10-03 12:37:07
Subject: Re: pgsql: Add relation fork support to pg_relation_size() function.
Previous:From: Gregory StarkDate: 2008-10-03 09:31:07
Subject: Re: pgsql: Add relation fork support to pg_relation_size() function.

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group