Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Posting to hackers and patches lists

From: "Marko Kreen" <markokr(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Matthew T(dot) O'connor" <matthew(at)zeut(dot)net>, "Alex Hunsaker" <badalex(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Bruce Momjian" <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, "Brendan Jurd" <direvus(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Posting to hackers and patches lists
Date: 2008-06-28 09:59:18
Message-ID: e51f66da0806280259l26e956f4r3554b3d60476c2b1@mail.gmail.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-patchespgsql-www
On 5/7/08, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> "Matthew T. O'connor" <matthew(at)zeut(dot)net> writes:
>  > By the way, what is the actual size limit on hackers vs patches.
>
> They do have different size limits; we'd have to raise the limit on
>  -hackers if we do this.  Marc would know exactly what the limits are.

Seems it's below 30k as my 34k (gz) patch was dropped yesterday.

-- 
marko

In response to

Responses

pgsql-www by date

Next:From: Marc G. FournierDate: 2008-06-28 12:44:41
Subject: Re: Posting to hackers and patches lists
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2008-06-28 03:56:58
Subject: postini/mi8.com spamming the lists with regurgitated posts. Again.

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Marc G. FournierDate: 2008-06-28 12:44:41
Subject: Re: Posting to hackers and patches lists
Previous:From: Gregory StarkDate: 2008-06-28 09:45:46
Subject: Re: interval madness ...

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Marc G. FournierDate: 2008-06-28 12:44:41
Subject: Re: Posting to hackers and patches lists
Previous:From: Tom RaneyDate: 2008-06-27 22:29:28
Subject: Re: Explain XML patch

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group