Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: OpenSSL Applink

From: "Marko Kreen" <markokr(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Dave Page" <dpage(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Andrew Dunstan" <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: OpenSSL Applink
Date: 2007-09-28 16:26:46
Message-ID: e51f66da0709280926o4d8a4a1cn4148598bea723217@mail.gmail.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches
On 9/28/07, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Dave Page <dpage(at)postgresql(dot)org> writes:
> > Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> >> Then I think I'd rather disable use of client certs for the offending
> >> openssl versions in libpq, or let the apps die and refer the customers
> >> to the openssl people to lobby them for a sane solution.
>
> > If this were 8.0 I'd agree, but thats not a nice solution for those
> > already using client certs (such as the pgAdmin user who brought this to
> > my attention).
>
> Doesn't really matter.  Even if we were willing to hack our own client
> apps like that (which I'm not), we can *not* transfer such a requirement
> onto every libpq-using application.  It's just not acceptable.

Is it possible to use GNUTLS on Windows?

-- 
marko

In response to

Responses

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Dave PageDate: 2007-09-28 16:30:29
Subject: Re: OpenSSL Applink
Previous:From: Dave PageDate: 2007-09-28 16:26:35
Subject: Re: OpenSSL Applink

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group