On 3/30/07, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> wrote:
> I, personally, think that it's worth talking about integrating these.
> However, the old versions were definitely NOT ready for integration, and the
> new versions went on the internet like a week ago. Heck, I haven't even
> downloaded them yet.
Yeah, the old version was bit too complicated. Thats why we
did a rewrite. And it turned out nice and simple.
> Can we address these on the 8.4 timeline? That will give the rest of us in
> the community time to download, try and debug the new SkyTools. I know I'm
> planning on testing them and will know a lot more about your code/performance
> in a few months. Is there a reason why getting PL/proxy into 8.3 is
No hurry. Just the timing was too good...
Also, if there are some design/API issues that may hinder
merging, we'd like to solve them immidiately.
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Russell Smith||Date: 2007-03-31 08:25:52|
|Subject: Re: Feature thought: idle in transaction timeout|
|Previous:||From: Marko Kreen||Date: 2007-03-31 07:40:00|
|Subject: Re: Proposal: include PL/Proxy into core|