Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Proposal: include PL/Proxy into core

From: "Marko Kreen" <markokr(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Josh Berkus" <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, "Hannu Krosing" <hannu(at)skype(dot)net>
Subject: Re: Proposal: include PL/Proxy into core
Date: 2007-03-31 08:19:44
Message-ID: e51f66da0703310119h36c5eaa0y70661ede01e9c361@mail.gmail.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On 3/30/07, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> wrote:
> I, personally, think that it's worth talking about integrating these.
> However, the old versions were definitely NOT ready for integration, and the
> new versions went on the internet like a week ago.  Heck, I haven't even
> downloaded them yet.

Yeah, the old version was bit too complicated.  Thats why we
did a rewrite.  And it turned out nice and simple.

> Can we address these on the 8.4 timeline?  That will give the rest of us in
> the community time to download, try and debug the new SkyTools.  I know I'm
> planning on testing them and will know a lot more about your code/performance
> in a few months.  Is there a reason why getting PL/proxy into 8.3 is
> critical?

No hurry.  Just the timing was too good...

Also, if there are some design/API issues that may hinder
merging, we'd like to solve them immidiately.

-- 
marko

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Russell SmithDate: 2007-03-31 08:25:52
Subject: Re: Feature thought: idle in transaction timeout
Previous:From: Marko KreenDate: 2007-03-31 07:40:00
Subject: Re: Proposal: include PL/Proxy into core

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group