Re: No error when FROM is missing in subquery

From: "Nikolay Samokhvalov" <samokhvalov(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: No error when FROM is missing in subquery
Date: 2006-12-18 23:15:03
Message-ID: e431ff4c0612181515v7a7deea2pedd28f0a3c572012@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

ok, sorry, I've realized that it's yet another example of "outer
reference", Tom will say "read any SQL book" again :-)

http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-bugs/2006-12/msg00115.php

On 12/19/06, Nikolay Samokhvalov <samokhvalov(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Following query is considered as correct, no "missing from" error has
> been reported (so, entire table will be updated and "on update"
> triggers will be fired for every row):
>
> update item set obj_id = obj_id
> where obj_id in (select obj_id where item_point is null order by
> obj_modified limit 10)
>
> Is it a bug? If no, maybe to produce warning in such cases?
>
> --
> Best regards,
> Nikolay
>

--
Best regards,
Nikolay

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jaime Casanova 2006-12-19 01:19:08 Re: No error when FROM is missing in subquery
Previous Message Nikolay Samokhvalov 2006-12-18 23:01:22 No error when FROM is missing in subquery