2010/1/29 Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>:
> 2010/1/28 Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>:
>> On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 9:01 AM, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>> simplest could not be a best. There have to be only a const
>>> expression. But we have not possibility to check it in pg.
>> Well... that's an entirely arbitrary limitation. I admit that it
>> doesn't seem likely that someone would want to have a variable
>> delimiter, but putting extra effort and code complexity into
>> preventing it seems pointless.
> It is only a few lines with zero complexity.
> The main issue of Takahiro proposal is "unclean" behave.
> we can have a content
> c1 c2
> c11, c12,
> c21, c22
> and result of string_agg(c1, c2)
> have to be ?? c11 c12 c21 or c11 c22 c21 ?? What if some content of c2
> will be NULL ?? I checked oracle. Oracle doesn't allow variable as
> delimiter. We can't check it. But we can fix first value and using it
> as constant.
What about get_fn_expr_arg_stable() to check if the argument is stable
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Robert Haas||Date: 2010-01-28 17:09:08|
|Subject: Re: Streaming replication, and walsender during recovery|
|Previous:||From: Andrew Dunstan||Date: 2010-01-28 17:02:49|
|Subject: Re: Add on_trusted_init and on_untrusted_init to plperl