From: | "Hitoshi Harada" <umi(dot)tanuki(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: TODO items for window functions |
Date: | 2008-12-29 18:26:48 |
Message-ID: | e08cc0400812291026o3147cce3i7bba38c9a8121bff@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
2008/12/30 Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>:
> Hah, I had missed that fine point. Okay, doc is wrong and I will fix.
>
> Given that, I think that a suitable minimum implementation should cover
> both the RANGE/ROWS distinction and the CURRENT ROW/UNBOUNDED FOLLOWING
> distinction, ie I would like 8.4 to support
>
> RANGE BETWEEN UNBOUNDED PRECEDING AND CURRENT ROW
> RANGE BETWEEN UNBOUNDED PRECEDING AND UNBOUNDED FOLLOWING
> ROWS BETWEEN UNBOUNDED PRECEDING AND CURRENT ROW
> ROWS BETWEEN UNBOUNDED PRECEDING AND UNBOUNDED FOLLOWING
>
> (1 is the default, 2 and 4 behave the same unless I'm still missing
> something.)
My understanding is as well.
> Is this something you're interested in working on? I can tackle it
> if you don't have time now.
>
> regards, tom lane
>
Sorry, over the new year days, I don't have time and will be remote.
Maybe from 3th or 4th I can work on this, so if you have time during
time I would like you to do it. Otherwise, I will.
Regards,
--
Hitoshi Harada
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2008-12-29 18:29:58 | Re: TODO items for window functions |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2008-12-29 18:19:32 | Re: TODO items for window functions |