Re: TODO items for window functions

From: "Hitoshi Harada" <umi(dot)tanuki(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: TODO items for window functions
Date: 2008-12-29 18:26:48
Message-ID: e08cc0400812291026o3147cce3i7bba38c9a8121bff@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

2008/12/30 Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>:
> Hah, I had missed that fine point. Okay, doc is wrong and I will fix.
>
> Given that, I think that a suitable minimum implementation should cover
> both the RANGE/ROWS distinction and the CURRENT ROW/UNBOUNDED FOLLOWING
> distinction, ie I would like 8.4 to support
>
> RANGE BETWEEN UNBOUNDED PRECEDING AND CURRENT ROW
> RANGE BETWEEN UNBOUNDED PRECEDING AND UNBOUNDED FOLLOWING
> ROWS BETWEEN UNBOUNDED PRECEDING AND CURRENT ROW
> ROWS BETWEEN UNBOUNDED PRECEDING AND UNBOUNDED FOLLOWING
>
> (1 is the default, 2 and 4 behave the same unless I'm still missing
> something.)

My understanding is as well.

> Is this something you're interested in working on? I can tackle it
> if you don't have time now.
>
> regards, tom lane
>

Sorry, over the new year days, I don't have time and will be remote.
Maybe from 3th or 4th I can work on this, so if you have time during
time I would like you to do it. Otherwise, I will.

Regards,

--
Hitoshi Harada

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2008-12-29 18:29:58 Re: TODO items for window functions
Previous Message Tom Lane 2008-12-29 18:19:32 Re: TODO items for window functions