Re: Windowing Function Patch Review -> Standard Conformance

patch-2

2008/11/8 Hitoshi Harada <umi(dot)tanuki(at)gmail(dot)com>:
> David, Vladimir,
>
> 2008/11/5 Hitoshi Harada <umi(dot)tanuki(at)gmail(dot)com>:
>> Now my assumption is broken. Let me take time to think about how to solve it...
>
> I fixed the points we discussed a few days ago. The delta is here:
>
> http://git.postgresql.org/?p=~davidfetter/window_functions/.git;a=commitdiff;h=bfbc039f68aa749b403c84a803d49a02b3d6c199;hp=bbba638f721a7e1d11cb3ee6af3bc1d7d3c11aa8
>
> although attached is the whole (split) patch.
>
> In addition to fixing cume_dist() and implicit frame definition, I
> added two window function APIs, WinRowIsPeer() and WinIterFinish(). Up
> to now I've avoided to touch ORDER BY clause comparisons deeply,
> because I didn't see any abstraction in that except rank(). But now I
> know the very important word "peers" appears so many times in the
> spec, I'm inclined to implement some general mechanisms for those APIs
> like IsPeer(). Also, as with this version part of RANGE is supported,
> the road to the FRAME clause support got shorter than before.
>
> Thanks for your feedback and continuing tests!
>
> Regards,
>
>
> --
> Hitoshi Harada
>

--
Hitoshi Harada