Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: to_char and i18n

From: "Qingqing Zhou" <zhouqq(at)cs(dot)toronto(dot)edu>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: to_char and i18n
Date: 2005-12-22 03:49:45
Message-ID: dod7mi$1jsd$1@news.hub.org (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-patches
"Manuel Sugawara" <masm(at)fciencias(dot)unam(dot)mx> wrote
> Now that Oracle supports i18n dependant behavior in its to_char
> formatting functions (at least for its 10g release) I was wondering if
> a patch to support this in PostgreSQL will get accepted. I was hoping
> to work on this now that I have some spare time.
>

Can you give a small introduction of i18n and what's your plan in 
PostgreSQL?

Regards,
Qingqing 



In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2005-12-22 04:00:31
Subject: Re: Automatic function replanning
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2005-12-22 03:37:09
Subject: Re: catalog corruption bug

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Manuel SugawaraDate: 2005-12-22 04:10:43
Subject: Re: to_char and i18n
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2005-12-22 03:17:30
Subject: Re: [BUGS] BUG #2120: Crash when doing UTF8<->ISO_8859_8 encoding conversion

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group