Worked great, vacuumlo finished, a vacuum -full finished amazingly quickly,
very exciting. We're pointing qa apps at it now for testing.
For some reason though, that index has to be rebuilt after running
I'll be testing on our 100GB+ prod copy shortly and will let you know if you
On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 9:28 AM, Alvaro Herrera
> Jamie Fox wrote:
> > Hi -
> > REINDEX INDEX pg_largeobject_loid_pn_index;
> > This seems to have fixed the problem, lo_open of lob data is working
> again -
> > now to see how vacuumlo likes it.
> So did it work?
> Alvaro Herrera
> The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Fernando Ike de Oliveira||Date: 2009-07-15 21:38:31|
|Subject: Re: [PATCH] Psql List Languages|
|Previous:||From: Heikki Linnakangas||Date: 2009-07-15 21:03:25|
|Subject: Re: Synch Rep for CommitFest 2009-07|
pgsql-general by date
|Next:||From: Scott Marlowe||Date: 2009-07-15 21:55:36|
|Subject: Areca 1680 and RHEL/Centos 5.3 issue|
|Previous:||From: Scott Marlowe||Date: 2009-07-15 20:24:25|
|Subject: Re: savepoints in 8.3.7 or whatever...|