Re: large object does not exist after pg_migrator

From: Jamie Fox <jfox(at)directcommerce(dot)com>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: large object does not exist after pg_migrator
Date: 2009-07-13 22:21:39
Message-ID: de22a6520907131521g41a3c7bdg7d9f083be54a819a@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

Hi -
This is probably more helpful - the pg_largeobject table only changed after
vacuumlo, not before. When comparing pre- and post- pg_migrator databases
(no vacuum or vacuumlo):

select * from pg_largeobject where loid = '24696063';

in the pre- there are three rows, having pageno 0 through 3, in the post-
database there are no results.

Thanks for any advice,

Jamie

On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 2:13 PM, Jamie Fox <jfox(at)directcommerce(dot)com> wrote:

> Hi -
> After what seemed to be a normal successful pg_migrator migration from
> 8.3.7 to 8.4.0, in either link or copy mode, vacuumlo fails on both our
> production and qa databases:
>
> Jul 1 11:17:03 db2 postgres[9321]: [14-1] LOG: duration: 175.563 ms
> statement: DELETE FROM vacuum_l WHERE lo IN (SELECT "xml_data" FROM
> "public"."xml_user")
> Jul 1 11:17:03 db2 postgres[9321]: [15-1] ERROR: large object 17919608
> does not exist
> Jul 1 11:17:03 db2 postgres[9321]: [16-1] ERROR: current transaction is
> aborted, commands ignored until end of transaction block
>
> I migrated our qa database using pg_dump/pg_restore and vacuumlo has no
> problem with it. When I try querying the two databases for large objects
> manually I see the same error in the one that was migrated with pg_migrator:
>
> select loread(lo_open(xml_data,262144),1073741819) from xml_user where id =
> '10837246';
> ERROR: large object 24696063 does not exist
> SQL state: 42704
>
> I can also see that the pg_largeobject table is different, in the
> pg_restore version the Rows (estimated) is 316286 and Rows (counted) is the
> same, in the pg_migrator version the Rows (counted) is only 180507.
>
> Any advice on what I might look for to try and track down this problem?
> pg_restore on our production database takes too long so it would be really
> nice to use pg_migrator instead.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Jamie
>
>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2009-07-13 22:27:35 Re: [GENERAL] large object does not exist after pg_migrator
Previous Message Tilmann Singer 2009-07-13 22:01:12 pg_migrator not setting values of sequences?

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kevin Grittner 2009-07-13 22:22:07 Re: Index-only scans
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2009-07-13 22:04:20 Re: Alpha release process