Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Serialized Access

From: "Phillip Mills" <pmills(at)systemcore(dot)ca>
To: "Scott Marlowe" <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Serialized Access
Date: 2008-06-26 12:20:04
Message-ID: dd0408e50806260520h36abaa24n3cfa24f21b84dc40@mail.gmail.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 10:55 PM, Scott Marlowe <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com>
wrote:

> Until you benchmark it for your app you really don't know how
> inefficient it really is compared to pessimistic locking.
>

Sure.  The question was about more about finding the right approach/layer
for implementing pessimistic locking so that comparisons *could* be made.

In response to

pgsql-general by date

Next:From: Phillip MillsDate: 2008-06-26 12:34:26
Subject: Re: Serialized Access
Previous:From: Oleg BartunovDate: 2008-06-26 12:05:09
Subject: Re: HTML tags and tsearch2

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group