Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: mysql to postgresql, performance questions

From: Scott Marlowe <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Dave Crooke <dcrooke(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Ross J(dot) Reedstrom" <reedstrm(at)rice(dot)edu>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: mysql to postgresql, performance questions
Date: 2010-03-23 23:30:48
Message-ID: dcc563d11003231630o61ac2c76qccea3256bb3354d0@mail.gmail.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 5:07 PM, Dave Crooke <dcrooke(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> What about InnoDB?

Depends on what parts of mysql they otherwise use.  There are plenty
of features that won't work if you're using non-myisam tables, like
full text search.  I tend to think any full blown (or nearly so) db is
overkill for mythtv, and the use of something like sqllite or berkely
db tables is a better fit.

In response to

Responses

pgsql-performance by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2010-03-23 23:35:33
Subject: Re: mysql to postgresql, performance questions
Previous:From: Bhella Paramjeet-PFCW67Date: 2010-03-23 23:28:03
Subject: Re: tuning auto vacuum for highly active tables

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group