Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: mysql to postgresql, performance questions

From: Scott Marlowe <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Ross J(dot) Reedstrom" <reedstrm(at)rice(dot)edu>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: mysql to postgresql, performance questions
Date: 2010-03-23 20:10:03
Message-ID: dcc563d11003231310p5d110679n2e0cd0d3e61e08f3@mail.gmail.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 1:22 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> "Ross J. Reedstrom" <reedstrm(at)rice(dot)edu> writes:
>> On Sat, Mar 20, 2010 at 10:47:30PM -0500, Andy Colson wrote:
>>> (I added the "and trust" as an after thought, because I do have one very
>>> important 100% uptime required mysql database that is running.  Its my
>>> MythTV box at home, and I have to ask permission from my GF before I take
>>> the box down to upgrade anything.  And heaven forbid if it crashes or
>>> anything.  So I do have experience with care and feeding of mysql.  And no,
>>> I'm not kidding.)
>
>> Andy, you are so me! I have the exact same one-and-only-one mission
>> critical mysql DB, but the gatekeeper is my wife. And experience with
>> that instance has made me love and trust PostgreSQL even more.
>
> So has anyone looked at porting MythTV to PG?

Or SQLite.  I'm guessing that most loads on it are single threaded.

In response to

pgsql-performance by date

Next:From: Bhella Paramjeet-PFCW67Date: 2010-03-23 20:54:37
Subject: tuning auto vacuum for highly active tables
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2010-03-23 19:22:01
Subject: Re: mysql to postgresql, performance questions

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group