On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 9:20 AM, Alvaro Herrera
<alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
> Scott Marlowe escribió:
>> 2010/2/1  <wyx6fox(at)sina(dot)com>:
>
>> Let's rewrite this assertion:
>> > * joke 1: insert operation would use a excluse lock on reference row by the
>> > foreign key . a big big big performance killer , i think this is a stupid
>> > design .
>>
>> "problem #1: insert operation would use a excluse lock on reference row by the
>> foreign key . a big big big performance killer.  "
>
> Yeah, if it had been written this way I could have told him that this
> is not the case since 8.1, but since he didn't, I simply skipped his
> emails.

I wonder if having paid technical support to abuse leads to people
thinking they can treat other people like crap and get the answer they
want anyway...  Well, we'll see if the OP can write a non-flame-filled
inquiry on their performance issues or not.

In response to

• Re: the jokes for pg concurrency write performance at 2010-02-02 16:20:46 from Alvaro Herrera

Responses

• Re: the jokes for pg concurrency write performance at 2010-02-03 07:35:52 from Greg Smith

pgsql-performance by date

Next:	From: Robert Haas	Date: 2010-02-02 17:36:12
	Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: Faster CREATE DATABASE by delaying fsync (was 8.4.1 ubuntu karmic slow createdb)
Previous:	From: Alvaro Herrera	Date: 2010-02-02 16:20:46
	Subject: Re: the jokes for pg concurrency write performance