On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 6:17 PM, Karl Larsson <karl(dot)larsson47(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> Best bet is to post the real problem, not a semi-representational made
>> up one. Unless the made up "test case" is truly representative and
>> recreates the failure pretty much the same was as the original.
> I agree at some level but I generally believe other people won't read
> a big mail like that. In this case it might come to a big post from me
> one day soon. :-)
You're on the one mailing list where they will read big posts. It's
best if you can attach the explain analyze output as an attachment
tho, to keep it's format readable.
In response to
pgsql-performance by date
|Next:||From: Craig Ringer||Date: 2009-12-18 02:20:14|
|Subject: Re: Automatic optimization of IN clauses via INNER JOIN|
|Previous:||From: Karl Larsson||Date: 2009-12-18 01:17:18|
|Subject: Re: seq scan instead of index scan|