| From: | "Scott Marlowe" <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Rafael Domiciano" <rafael(dot)domiciano(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "Matthew T(dot) O'Connor" <matthew(at)zeut(dot)net>, "Rafael Martinez" <r(dot)m(dot)guerrero(at)usit(dot)uio(dot)no>, "pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Vacuum Problems |
| Date: | 2008-12-08 15:35:28 |
| Message-ID: | dcc563d10812080735h42d94633v46449d9933dd22c@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-admin |
On Mon, Dec 8, 2008 at 6:04 AM, Rafael Domiciano
<rafael(dot)domiciano(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Hello guys,
> I tried to modify my vacuum routine, and started to only run vacuum verbose
> analyze diary followed by a reindex weekly.
> But I still having problems in my database. The uptime database is hard to
> stay below 10.
> I'm thinking that my hardware is not more good as it was sometime ago.
> The machine is a: 2 x Intel Xeon Dual-Core 2.3 GHz, 2 Gb RAM. The load on
> machine is about at 10000 transactions / m
> Maybe I need more RAM memory?
Likely you need more hard drives and / or a quality caching RAID
controller. What's your I/O subsystem look like now?
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Scott Marlowe | 2008-12-08 15:35:55 | Re: Vacuum Problems |
| Previous Message | Daniel Scott | 2008-12-08 14:36:35 | Change user password |