Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: PITR question with base backup

From: "Scott Marlowe" <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Scott Whitney" <swhitney(at)journyx(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: PITR question with base backup
Date: 2008-10-22 02:13:44
Message-ID: dcc563d10810211913r75736d25nebb8f3258930762c@mail.gmail.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin
On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 2:29 PM, Scott Whitney <swhitney(at)journyx(dot)com> wrote:
> It is, is it? I was completely under the impression that it was not. Don't
> ask me where I got that impression. :)
>
> No problem whatsoever, in that case!
>
> Thanks for clearing up my inability to comprehend documentation...

This is what I like so much about PostgreSQL.  Most of the surprises
are of the "oh wow!  That's cool" Not the "oh shit!" kind.  :)

In response to

pgsql-admin by date

Next:From: Scott MarloweDate: 2008-10-22 02:18:23
Subject: Re: pg_dumpall size
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2008-10-21 20:55:42
Subject: Re: pg_dumpall size twist

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group