On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 2:29 PM, Scott Whitney <swhitney(at)journyx(dot)com> wrote:
> It is, is it? I was completely under the impression that it was not. Don't
> ask me where I got that impression. :)
> No problem whatsoever, in that case!
> Thanks for clearing up my inability to comprehend documentation...
This is what I like so much about PostgreSQL. Most of the surprises
are of the "oh wow! That's cool" Not the "oh shit!" kind. :)
In response to
pgsql-admin by date
|Next:||From: Scott Marlowe||Date: 2008-10-22 02:18:23|
|Subject: Re: pg_dumpall size|
|Previous:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2008-10-21 20:55:42|
|Subject: Re: pg_dumpall size twist |