Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: replication with table add/removes..

From: "Scott Marlowe" <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Martin Badie" <martinbadie(at)yahoo(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: replication with table add/removes..
Date: 2008-10-08 18:28:54
Message-ID: dcc563d10810081128i25f9471cv81e8092d4094bd1b@mail.gmail.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin
On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 9:10 AM, Martin Badie <martinbadie(at)yahoo(dot)com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a system that have constant table adds/removes are present. I want to
> make a replication between master and slaves but not sure which one is the
> best solution for that kind of a situation. Since I am new to replication
> stuff on postgresql I am truly lost but I know that Slony is not an answer
> for replications where table add/remove are present.

I think that pgpool might work for this.  There are probably some
other "front end" type replication systems that would work too.

In response to

pgsql-admin by date

Next:From: FabricioDate: 2008-10-08 18:54:40
Subject: About pg_hba.conf
Previous:From: Scott MarloweDate: 2008-10-08 18:16:33
Subject: Re: checkpoint_timeout

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group