On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 9:10 AM, Martin Badie <martinbadie(at)yahoo(dot)com> wrote:
> I have a system that have constant table adds/removes are present. I want to
> make a replication between master and slaves but not sure which one is the
> best solution for that kind of a situation. Since I am new to replication
> stuff on postgresql I am truly lost but I know that Slony is not an answer
> for replications where table add/remove are present.
I think that pgpool might work for this. There are probably some
other "front end" type replication systems that would work too.
In response to
pgsql-admin by date
|Next:||From: Fabricio||Date: 2008-10-08 18:54:40|
|Subject: About pg_hba.conf|
|Previous:||From: Scott Marlowe||Date: 2008-10-08 18:16:33|
|Subject: Re: checkpoint_timeout|