Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: RAID arrays and performance

From: "Scott Marlowe" <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Greg Smith" <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com>
Cc: "Matthew Wakeling" <matthew(at)flymine(dot)org>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: RAID arrays and performance
Date: 2008-09-18 19:33:55
Message-ID: dcc563d10809181233r4898b5abgf96b6be54a3f76b0@mail.gmail.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance
On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 1:30 PM, Greg Smith <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com> wrote:
> If you have some specific bitmap index scan test case suggestions you can
> pass along (either publicly or in private to me, I can probably help
> anonymize them), that's one of the things that has been holding this up.
> Alternately, if you'd like to join in on testing this all out more help
> would certainly be welcome.

I posted in pgsql-perform about a problem that's using bitmap heap
scans that's really slow compared to just using nested-loops.  Don't
know if that is relevant or not.

In response to

pgsql-performance by date

Next:From: Rainer MagerDate: 2008-09-19 00:34:32
Subject: why does this use the wrong index?
Previous:From: Greg SmithDate: 2008-09-18 19:30:00
Subject: Re: RAID arrays and performance

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group