On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 3:38 PM, Bill <pg(at)dbginc(dot)com> wrote:
> I am new to PostgreSQL but it seems to me that lastval() will only work if
> the insert does not produce side effects that call nextval(). Consider the
> case where a row is inserted into a table that has an after insert trigger
> and the after insert trigger inserts a row into another table which has a
> serial primary key. In that case I assume that lastval() will return the
> value from the serial column in the second table.
No, setval, currval, and lastval all require as an argument a sequence
name. So the real issue is you have to know the sequence name to use
The problem with lastval is that it reports the last value that the
sequence gave out whether it was to us or someone else. this makes it
NOT SAFE for concurrent transactions, but more for maintenance work.
I use returning almost exclusively now.
In response to
pgsql-general by date
|Next:||From: Albretch Mueller||Date: 2008-08-28 22:14:01|
|Subject: Re: ERROR: relation . . . does not exist|
|Previous:||From: Fernando Moreno||Date: 2008-08-28 21:41:14|
|Subject: log_statement not working on pl/pgsql functions|