Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: rule question

From: "Scott Marlowe" <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Tim Rupp" <caphrim007(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "Klint Gore" <kgore4(at)une(dot)edu(dot)au>, Devi <devi(at)visolve(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: rule question
Date: 2008-02-29 14:15:45
Message-ID: dcc563d10802290615v50a02e54s4bfdfc29f0b10b6f@mail.gmail.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general
On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 4:08 AM, Tim Rupp <caphrim007(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

>  One other question. If the lock needed is exclusive, and more inserts
>  come in after it is requested, will Postgres schedule the rule to be
>  created before those new inserts are allowed to happen? Or can the rule
>  request sit there and wait indefinitely for it's exclusive lock.

PostgreSQL will process the transactions in order.

In response to

pgsql-general by date

Next:From: Gurjeet SinghDate: 2008-02-29 14:56:43
Subject: Re: LIMIT Question
Previous:From: Sam MasonDate: 2008-02-29 13:50:28
Subject: Re: LIMIT Question

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group