Re: WAL Log Size

From: "Scott Marlowe" <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Greg Smith" <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com>
Cc: "Sam Mason" <sam(at)samason(dot)me(dot)uk>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: WAL Log Size
Date: 2008-02-29 07:25:13
Message-ID: dcc563d10802282325g53b5b614s5bbc9cecbf22d9f1@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 1:08 AM, Greg Smith <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com> wrote:
> On Fri, 29 Feb 2008, Sam Mason wrote:
>
> > Just out of interest, why doesn't it do the following?
> >
> > BEGIN;
> > create table xlog_switch as
> > select '0123456789ABCDE' from generate_series(1,1000000);
> > ROLLBACK;
>
> I'm not 100% sure here what happens when you do the above, and it depends
> on version, but there are cases where creating a new or empty table in a
> transaction is optimized to not create any WAL as a performance
> improvement. This has become a common idiom for that reason:

That's why the create table statement up there had the from
generate_series bit...

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Oleg Bartunov 2008-02-29 08:06:40 Re: Text Search zero padding
Previous Message Greg Smith 2008-02-29 07:08:13 Re: WAL Log Size