Re: Dual core Opterons beating quad core Xeons?

From: "Scott Marlowe" <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: "Greg Smith" <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com>, "Stuart Bishop" <stuart(at)stuartbishop(dot)net>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Dual core Opterons beating quad core Xeons?
Date: 2007-12-19 19:03:32
Message-ID: dcc563d10712191103p1224b6c2vc51f70a85fae5c49@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

On Dec 19, 2007 12:59 PM, Joshua D. Drake <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Wed, 19 Dec 2007 13:50:29 -0500 (EST)
> Greg Smith <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com> wrote:
>
> > > With PG 8.2 and 8.3, is it still pretty much limited to 8 cores
> > > making 2 of the quad core Xeons redundant or detrimental?
> >
> > Where'd you get the idea 8 cores was a limit? As cores go up
> > eventually you run out of disk or memory bandwidth, but how that
> > plays out is very application dependant and there's no hard line
> > anywhere.
>
> Actually this is not true. Although I have yet to test 8.3. It is
> pretty much common knowledge that after 8 cores the acceleration of
> performance drops with PostgreSQL...

I thought Tom had played with some simple hacks that got the scaling
pretty close to linear for up to 16 cores earlier this year...

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joshua D. Drake 2007-12-19 19:07:44 Re: Dual core Opterons beating quad core Xeons?
Previous Message Joshua D. Drake 2007-12-19 18:59:21 Re: Dual core Opterons beating quad core Xeons?