| From: | "Scott Marlowe" <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Sachchida Ojha" <sojha(at)secure-elements(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "Michael Glaesemann" <grzm(at)seespotcode(dot)net>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Autovacuum is running forever |
| Date: | 2007-08-21 22:19:59 |
| Message-ID: | dcc563d10708211519q7bd741b2g5912f3bdf298e908@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
On 8/21/07, Sachchida Ojha <sojha(at)secure-elements(dot)com> wrote:
> We are having only two disk (40GB each). One disk is used for OS, App
> Server, and application. Second disk is used for postgresql database.
> It's a dual cpu machine having 2 GB of ram.
Even a single disk, with a battery backed caching controller will
generally run things like updates and inserts much faster, and is
usually a much better performance under load than a single disk.
I'd at least look at mirroring them for redundancy and better read performance.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Sachchida Ojha | 2007-08-21 22:20:02 | Re: Autovacuum is running forever |
| Previous Message | Sachchida Ojha | 2007-08-21 22:07:44 | Re: Autovacuum is running forever |