| From: | Selena Deckelmann <selena(at)chrisking(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | merlyn(at)stonehenge(dot)com (Randal L(dot) Schwartz) |
| Cc: | "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com>, pdxpug(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: PERFORMANCE meeting summary & next meeting topic! |
| Date: | 2006-09-20 17:54:26 |
| Message-ID: | dba74d7d1432008a3e9561a026cb1bdb@chrisking.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pdxpug |
On Sep 20, 2006, at 10:33 AM, Randal L. Schwartz wrote:
>>>>>> "David" == David E Wheeler <david(at)kineticode(dot)com> writes:
>
> David> On Sep 20, 2006, at 09:03, Selena Deckelmann wrote:
>>> The general consensus was that she should upgrade. We didn't have
>>> a clear
>>> answer to why the query was so slow in the older version, but it
>>> was clear
>>> that it was faster in the newer version of postgresql.
>
> David> Actually, I think that the consensus was that she should try
> increasing the
> David> sort_mem on the 7.4 database to see if that helps. But
> upgrading is a
> David> no-brainer, too. :-)
>
> Does that mean there's no consensus on what the consensus was? Eeek!
I think it means that I have a hard time remembering things after two
beers.
-selena
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Roth, Gabrielle | 2006-09-20 21:40:00 | Re: PERFORMANCE meeting summary & next meeting topic! |
| Previous Message | Selena Deckelmann | 2006-09-20 17:53:25 | Re: PERFORMANCE meeting summary & next meeting topic! |