Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: PERFORMANCE meeting summary & next meeting topic!

From: Selena Deckelmann <selena(at)chrisking(dot)com>
To: merlyn(at)stonehenge(dot)com (Randal L(dot) Schwartz)
Cc: "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com>, pdxpug(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: PERFORMANCE meeting summary & next meeting topic!
Date: 2006-09-20 17:54:26
Message-ID: dba74d7d1432008a3e9561a026cb1bdb@chrisking.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pdxpug
On Sep 20, 2006, at 10:33 AM, Randal L. Schwartz wrote:

>>>>>> "David" == David E Wheeler <david(at)kineticode(dot)com> writes:
>
> David> On Sep 20, 2006, at 09:03, Selena Deckelmann wrote:
>>> The general consensus was that she should upgrade.  We didn't have  
>>> a clear
>>> answer to why the query was so slow in the older version,  but it 
>>> was clear
>>> that it was faster in the newer version of  postgresql.
>
> David> Actually, I think that the consensus was that she should try  
> increasing the
> David> sort_mem on the 7.4 database to see if that helps. But  
> upgrading is a
> David> no-brainer, too. :-)
>
> Does that mean there's no consensus on what the consensus was?  Eeek!

I think it means that I have a hard time remembering things after two 
beers.

-selena


In response to

pdxpug by date

Next:From: Roth, GabrielleDate: 2006-09-20 21:40:00
Subject: Re: PERFORMANCE meeting summary & next meeting topic!
Previous:From: Selena DeckelmannDate: 2006-09-20 17:53:25
Subject: Re: PERFORMANCE meeting summary & next meeting topic!

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group