2005/12/15, Dave Page <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>:
> > Le Mardi 13 Décembre 2005 00:48, Guillaume LELARGE a écrit:
> > > Le Samedi 10 Décembre 2005 16:55, Andreas Pflug a écrit:
> > > > Dave Page wrote:
> > > > >>I still think this patch should be applied.
> > > > >
> > > > > Does anyone see a reason /not/ to do this?
> > > >
> > > > Hm, Guillaume started a thread on pgsql-hackers about
> > renaming system
> > > > schemas in general, maybe we should wait for the result of that
> > > > discussion.
> > >
> > > Well, it seems that pg_* schemas are system schemas and
> > that public and
> > > information_schema schemas are public one. I think we
> > should exclude system
> > > schemas depending on their names and show public and
> > information_schema,
> > > whatever their actual name are.
> > >
> > > I can bring a new patch if you agree with this and if you
> > find this useful.
> > What about this one ?
> I've applied a modified version of this patch - thanks.
I'm OK with your changes. Thanks for applying.
pgadmin-hackers by date
|Next:||From: svn||Date: 2005-12-15 15:06:14|
|Subject: SVN Commit by andreas: r4848 - trunk/www/pgadmin3/cnt|
|Previous:||From: svn||Date: 2005-12-15 09:28:23|
|Subject: SVN Commit by dpage: r4847 - in trunk/pgadmin3: . src/schema|