| From: | Nicolai Tufar <ntufar(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Magnus Hagander <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-hackers-win32(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] snprintf causes regression tests to fail |
| Date: | 2005-03-01 23:09:41 |
| Message-ID: | d8092939050301150915269538@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-hackers-win32 pgsql-patches |
On Tue, 01 Mar 2005 17:45:31 -0500, Tom Lane > Just out of curiosity,
do either HAVE_INT64 or HAVE_UINT64 get set
> in pg_config.h?
pg_config.h is attached. What drew my attention is the
following declaration:
/* Define to 1 if `long long int' works and is 64 bits. */
#define HAVE_LONG_LONG_INT_64
is it normal? should it not be like this:
#define HAVE_LONG_LONG_INT_64 1
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| pg_config.h | text/plain | 19.9 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2005-03-01 23:15:49 | Re: [HACKERS] snprintf causes regression tests to fail |
| Previous Message | Nicolai Tufar | 2005-03-01 22:57:46 | Re: [HACKERS] snprintf causes regression tests to fail |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2005-03-01 23:15:49 | Re: [HACKERS] snprintf causes regression tests to fail |
| Previous Message | Nicolai Tufar | 2005-03-01 22:57:46 | Re: [HACKERS] snprintf causes regression tests to fail |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Neil Conway | 2005-03-01 23:18:30 | Re: Where to see the patch queue (was Re: [PATCHES] Patch |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2005-03-01 22:45:31 | Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] snprintf causes regression tests to fail |