Re: ARC patent

From: Nicolai Tufar <ntufar(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Ismail Teppeev <iteppeev(at)gmail(dot)com>, John Hansen <john(at)geeknet(dot)com(dot)au>, Zeugswetter Andreas DAZ SD <ZeugswetterA(at)spardat(dot)at>, Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)yahoo(dot)com>, Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: ARC patent
Date: 2005-01-17 22:17:42
Message-ID: d80929390501171417173ba957@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, 17 Jan 2005 14:02:14 -0800, Joshua D. Drake
<jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
>
> >IBM can NEVER sue customers for using infringing
> >code before first informing them of infringement and
> >giving reasonable time to upgrade to uninfringing
> >version.
> I can see it now:
> We won't sue you (customer) but you have to upgrade
> to DB2 ;)

More like downgrading, actually ;)

> Sincerely,
> Joshua D. Drake

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Greg Stark 2005-01-17 22:25:18 Re: ARC patent
Previous Message Greg Stark 2005-01-17 22:17:24 Re: ARC patent