From: | Nicolai Tufar <ntufar(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)dcc(dot)uchile(dot)cl>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Devrim GUNDUZ <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [PATCHES] Latest Turkish translation updates |
Date: | 2005-01-17 15:51:49 |
Message-ID: | d809293905011707515f09a5c1@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
> >Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> > Maybe we should have a pgfoundry project where all translations were
> > kept, and from which the main CVS could be updated
> > semi-automatically. Then we wouldn't have Peter checking out and
> > committing all the time.
>
>Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> That sounds like a fine idea. My only concern would be the
> "not-maintained-here" syndrome, which occurs every time some CVS tree
> contains a file that is actually maintained by an external group, thus
> blocking the maintainers of the former CVS tree from applying necessary
> fixes at times. Nevertheless, I think this is a winner. Let's
> consider it when we start the 8.1 cycle.
It is definitely a winner. And I don't think anyonwone from
core group will object since Peter will be the only one who updates
main CVS tree. Just appoint a maintainer or two with cvs commit
priveleges for each language. It will ease your routine workload greatly.
Best regards,
Nicolai
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2005-01-17 17:28:21 | 4 hour countdown |
Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2005-01-17 15:01:00 | Re: [PATCHES] Latest Turkish translation updates |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | David Fetter | 2005-01-17 17:27:49 | Bag-over-head patch (was Re: PL/Perl doc patch) |
Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2005-01-17 15:01:00 | Re: [PATCHES] Latest Turkish translation updates |