Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: seq scan instead of index scan

From: Karl Larsson <karl(dot)larsson47(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Scott Marlowe <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: seq scan instead of index scan
Date: 2009-12-18 01:17:18
Message-ID: d7650d320912171717t472527b9v4d8563b23e3241f3@mail.gmail.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance
> Best bet is to post the real problem, not a semi-representational made
> up one.  Unless the made up "test case" is truly representative and
>  recreates the failure pretty much the same was as the original.

I agree at some level but I generally believe other people won't read
a big mail like that. In this case it might come to a big post from me
one day soon. :-)

Thanks to all who helped me.

/ Karl Larsson

In response to

Responses

pgsql-performance by date

Next:From: Scott MarloweDate: 2009-12-18 01:37:36
Subject: Re: seq scan instead of index scan
Previous:From: Scott MarloweDate: 2009-12-18 01:16:47
Subject: Re: seq scan instead of index scan

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group